Failed attempt to ban "The Kerala Story": Isn't it A selective approach towards Freedom Of Expression ?

 Freedom of expression is a fundamental right that forms the cornerstone of any democratic society. It allows individuals to express their thoughts ideas & creativity without fear of censorship or persecution. Recent endeavor by few states on the ban of the movie "The Kerala Story" raise concerns about the selective application of this cherished freedom. 

This article explores the implications of such bans and their impact on artistic expression. Freedom of expression is a vital element in fostering a healthy and vibrant society. It encourages open dialogue diverse perspectives & exchange of ideas. Art in all its forms has long been recognized as a powerful medium for expressing societal cultural, and political narratives. Movies in particular, have the ability to shed light on various issues challenge societal norms & initiate constructive debates.

Once the ban imposed by W.Bengal & Tamilnad Gov't which was called off by Honorable Supreme Court on the movie "Kerala Story" raises questions about the limits imposed on freedom of expression. While the specific reasons behind imposing the ban are unclear it is essential to examine whether the decision was based on valid concerns or if it represents a case of selective censorship. Banning a movie without a transparent and justifiable explanation undermines the principles of a democratic society.

When bans on artistic works occur it is crucial to evaluate whether they are impartial and fair. If certain movies or artworks are singled out for censorship on the contrary others with similar content or themes are allowed, it raises concerns about selective application. Such actions not only restrict the freedom of expression but also give rise to a climate of self-censorship, stifling creativity and inhibiting open discourse.

While the freedom of expression is important it should also be exercised responsibly. Filmmakers, artists & creators bear a moral responsibility to ensure their works do not promote hatred, incite violence or refrains the rights of others. However it is equally important for authorities to differentiate between artistic expression and harmful content and to adopt a measured approach in dealing with such cases.

To uphold the principles of a democratic society it is imperative that freedom of expression be protected & given respect. Rather than resorting to bans authorities should encourage dialogue and engage in constructive discussions with filmmakers and artists. Clear guidelines and transparent processes should be established to evaluate the content of artistic works (fictional or factual) ensuring that any restrictions are based on genuine concerns and not on arbitrary or political motivations.

Failed attempt to ban a movie like "The Kerala Story" raises significant questions about the freedom of expression and its selective application. While restrictions may be justified in certain cases, they should be based on objective criteria and transparent processes. Upholding the principles of freedom of expression not only encourages creativity and diverse perspectives but also strengthens the fabric of a democratic society. It is essential that societies strive to strike a balance between safeguarding this fundamental right and addressing any legitimate concerns that may arise.